Preview

Kachestvennaya Klinicheskaya Praktika = Good Clinical Practice

Advanced search

Pharmacoeconomic analysis of dexamethasone intravitreal implant for the treatment of diabetic macular edema in Russia

https://doi.org/10.24411/2588-0519-2018-10037

Abstract

A health economic study was conducted under the Russian economic conditions to evaluate the feasibility of the use of dexamethasone 0.7 mg as a sustained release intravitreal implant (hereinafter, DEX implant) in the treatment of diabetic macular edema. Cost-effectiveness analyses (CEA) were performed using a decision tree model with calculation of cost effectiveness ratios (CER), as well as incremental cost-effectiveness and cost-utility ratios (ICER and ICUR). Ranibizumab 10 mg/ml, solution for intravitreal administration (hereinafter, ranibizumab), and a­ibercept 40 mg/ml, solution for intravitreal administration (hereinafter, a­ibercept), were used as the comparator drugs; the modeling study covered a three-year period. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) was carried out to evaluate the level of uncertainty of the obtained results. A budget impact analysis was also performed. ‹Free scenarios were reviewed for each analysis: the main scenario for phakic and pseudophakic eyes with the weighted average effects of the study drugs; alternative scenario 1 for pseudophakic eyes with the weighted average effects; alternative scenario 2 for pseudophakic eyes with the maximum possible effects of the study drugs. A network meta-analysis of 10 randomized controlled studies (RCT) was performed to evaluate the weighted average effect. ‹e maximum possible effects were determined based on specific studies, including observational studies. ›e results of the main scenario and alternative scenario 1 demonstrated that the comparator drugs were inferior to the DEX implant with regard to the economic feasibility, since they had higher CER; the ICER and ICUR for the comparator drugs exceeded the social willingness to pay threshold. ‹e results of alternative scenario 2 demonstrated that the DEX implant was dominant with regard to ranibizumab, and it was superior to a­ibercept with regard to the CER, ICER, and ICUR. ‹The budget impact analysis demonstrated that a 3-year use of the DEX implant will allow to save the funds equivalent to an additional treatment of 102–189 patients if it replaces ranibizumab (depending on the scenario) or 72–286 patients if it replaces a­ibercept (depending on the scenario). ‹e sensitivity analysis demonstrated low level of uncertainty of study conclusions.

About the Authors

A. S. Kolbin
First Pavlov State Medical University of Saint Petersburg, Saint Petersburg, Russia; Saint Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg, Russia
Russian Federation

First St. Petersburg State Medical University named after I.P. Pavlova, Russia, St. Petersburg MD, Professor, Head of the Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Evidence-Based Medicine, First St. Petersburg State Medical University named aer I.P. Pavlova; professor of the Department of Pharmacology, Medical Faculty, St. Petersburg State University, Russia

SPIN code: 7966-0845



T. L. Galankin
First Pavlov State Medical University of Saint Petersburg, Saint Petersburg, Russia
Russian Federation

FGBOU VO First St. Petersburg State Medical University named aer acad. I.P. Pavlov of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, St. Petersburg; Candidate of Medical Sciences, Head of the laboratory of pharmacoepidemiology and pharmacokinetics in the First St. Petersburg State Medical University named aer acad. I.P. Pavlov of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, St. Petersburg

SPIN code: 7808-0586



A. I. Kaleev
Allergan CIS SARL, Moscow, Russia
Russian Federation
Pricing manager and the state programs of public health services


References

1. Eye Diseases Prevalence Research Group. The prevalence of diabetic retinopathy among adults in the United States. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004; 122:552–563.

2. Yau JW, Rogers SL, Kawasaki R, et al. Meta-Analysis for Eye Disease (METAEYE) Study Group. Global prevalence and major risk factors of diabetic retinopathy. Diabetes Care. 2012; 35:556–564.

3. Bhagat N, Grigorian RA, Tutela A, et al. Diabetic macular edema: pathogenesis and treatment. Surv Ophthalmol. 2009; 54:1–32.

4. Funatsu H, Noma H, Mimura T, et al. Association of vitreous inflammatory factors with diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology. 2009; 116:73–79.

5. Miyamoto K, Khosrof S, Bursell SE, et al. Prevention of leukostasis and vascular leakage in streptozotocin-induced diabetic retinopathy via intercellular adhesion molecule-1 inhibition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999; 96:10836–10841.

6. Antcliff RJ, Marshall J. The pathogenesis of edema in diabetic maculopathy. Semin Ophthalmol. 1999; 14:223–232.

7. American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes–2009. Diabetes Care. 2009; 32:S13–S61.

8. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Photocoagulation for diabetic macular edema. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study report number 1. Arch Ophthalmol. 1985; 103:1796–1806.

9. Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network. A randomized trial comparing intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide and focal/grid photocoagulation for diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology. 2008; 115:1447–1459.

10. Aiello LP, Edwards AR, Beck RW, et al. Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network. Factors associated with improvement and worsening of visual acuity 2 years after focal/grid photocoagulation for diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology. 2010; 117:946–953.

11. Nguyen QD, Brown DM, Marcus DM, et al. RISE and RIDE Research Group. Ranibizumab for diabetic macular edema: results from 2 phase III randomized trials: RISE and RIDE. Ophthalmology. 2012; 119:789–801.

12. Brown DM, Nguyen QD, Marcus DM, et al. RISE and RIDE Research Group. Long-term outcomes of ranibizumab therapy for diabetic macular edema: the 36-month results from two phase III trials: RISE and RIDE. Ophthalmology. 2013; 120:2013–2022.

13. Bhisitkul RB, Campochiaro PA., Shapiro H, et al. Predictive value in retinal vein occlusions of early versus late or incomplete ranibizumab response defined by optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology. 2013; 120:1057–1063.

14. Wang K, Wang Y, Gao L, et al. Dexamethasone inhibits leukocyte accumulation and vascular permeability in retina of streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats via reducing vascular endothelial growth factor and intercellular adhesion molecule-1 expression. Biol Pharm Bull. 2008; 31:1541–1546.

15. Tamura H, Miyamoto K, Kiryu J, et al. Intravitreal injection of corticosteroid attenuates leukostasis and vascular leakage in experimental diabetic retina. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005; 46:1440–1444.

16. Antonetti DA, Wolpert EB, DeMaio L, et al. Hydrocortisone decreases retinal endothelial cell water and solute flux coincident with increased content and decreased phosphorylation of occludin. J Neurochem. 2002; 80:667–677.

17. Chang-Lin JE, Attar M, Acheampong AA, et al. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a sustained-release dexamethasone intravitreal implant. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52:80–86.

18. Haller JA, Kuppermann BD, Blumenkranz MS, et al. Dexamethasone DDS Phase II Study Group. Randomized controlled trial of an intravitreous dexamethasone drug delivery system in patients with diabetic macular edema. Arch Ophthalmol. 2010; 128:289–296.

19. Pacella E, Vestri AR, Muscella R, et al. Preliminary results of an intravitreal dexamethasone implant (Ozurdex) in patients with persistent diabetic macular edema. Clin Ophthalmol. 2013; 7:1423–1428.

20. Lazic R, Lukic M, Boras I, et al. Treatment of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor-resistant diabetic macular edema with dexamethasone intravitreal implant. Retina. 2014; 34:719–724.

21. Boyer DS, Faber D, Gupta S, et al. Ozurdex CHAMPLAIN Study Group. Dexamethasone intravitreal implant for treatment of diabetic macular edema in vitrectomized patients. Retina. 2011; 31:915–923.

22. Boyer DS, et al. Three-Year, Randomized, Sham-Controlled Trial of Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implant in Patients with Diabetic Macular Edema. Ophthalmology. 2014; 121(10):1904–14.

23. Ministerstvo Zdravoohraneniya Rossijskoj Federacii, «Ob utverzhdenii otraslevogo standarta "kliniko-ehkonomicheskie issledovaniya. Obshchie polozheniya"» ot 27 maya 2011 goda. [Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, "An approval of the industry standard "Clinico-economic researchs. General provisions" dated may 27, 2011] (In Russ)

24. Osnovnye ponyatiya v ocenke medicinskih tekhnologij: metod. posobie. Pod. red. Kolbina AS, Zyryanova SK, Belousova DYu. Moskva: Izdatel'stvo OKI, 2013. 42 s.: il. [The main concepts in the evaluation of medical technologies: method. benefit. Under. Red. Colbin AS., Zyryanov SK., Belousov DYu. Moscow: Publisher OCI, 2013; 42] (In Russ)

25. Mitchell P, et al. The RESTORE Study: ranibizumab monotherapy or combined with laser versus laser monotherapy for diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology. 2011; 118:615–625.

26. Schmidt-Erfurth U, Lang GE, Holz FG., et al. Three-Year Outcomes of Individualized Ranibizumab Treatment in Patients with Diabetic Macular Edema. The RESTORE Extension Study. Ophthalmology 2014; 121(5):1045–1053.

27. Elman MJ., et al. Expanded 2-year Follow-up of Ranibizumab Plus Prompt or Deferred Laser or Triamcinolone Plus Prompt Laser for Diabetic Macular Edema. Ophthalmology. 2011; 118(4):609–614.

28. Elman MJ, et al. Intravitreal Ranibizumab for Diabetic Macular Edema with Prompt versus Deferred Laser Treatment: 5-Year Randomized Trial Results. Ophthalmology. 2015; 122(2):375–81.

29. Korobelnik JF, et al. Intravitreal Aflibercept for Diabetic Macular Edema. Ophthalmology 2014; 121:2247–2254.

30. Brown DM, et al. Intravitreal Aflibercept for Diabetic Macular Edema 100- Week Results From the VISTA and VIVID Studies. Ophthalmology 2015; 122(10):2044–2052.

31. Wells JA, et al. Aflibercept, Bevacizumab, or Ranibizumab for Diabetic Macular Edema. Two-Year Results from a Comparative Effectiveness Randomized Clinical Trial. Ophthalmology. 2016;123(6):1351–1359.

32. Massin P, Bandello F, Garweg JG, et al. Safety and efficacy of ranibizumab in diabetic macular edema (RESOLVE Study): a 12-month, randomized, controlled, double-masked, multicenter phase II study. Diabetes Care. 2010; 33(11):2399–2405.

33. Do DV, Nguyen QD, Boyer D, et al. DA VINCI Study Group. One-year outcomes of the DA VINCI Study of VEGF Trap-Eye in eyes with diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology. 2012; 119(8):1658–1665.

34. Escobar-Barranco JJ, Pina-Marín B, Fernández-Bonet M. Dexamethasone Implants in Patients with Naïve or Refractory Diffuse Diabetic Macular Edema. Ophthalmologica 2015; 233(3-4):176–85.

35. Guigou S, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant in Patients with Diabetic Macular Edema. Ophthalmologica. DOI: 2015; 10.1159/000381356.

36. Matonti F, et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of intravitreal dexamethasone implant for the treatment of diabetic macular edema. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2016; 26(6):e173.

37. Haller JA, Bandello F, Belfort RJr, et al. OZURDEX GENEVA Study Group, Randomized, sham-controlled trial of dexamethasone intravitreal implant in patients with macular edema due to retinal vein occlusion. Ophthalmology. 2010; 117(6):1134–1146.

38. Prünte C, Fajnkuchen F, Mahmood S, et al. Ranibizumab 0.5 mg treat-andextend regimen for diabetic macular oedema: the RETAIN study, Br J Ophthalmol, 2016; 100(6):787–95.

39. Dugel PU, et al. Baseline visual acuity strongly predicts visual acuity gain in patients with diabetic macular edema following anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment across trials. Clinical Ophthalmology. 2016; 10:1103–1110.

40. Fong DS, et al. Comparison of the modified Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study and mild macular grid laser photocoagulation strategies for diabetic macular edema. Arch Ophthalmol. 2007; 125(4):469–80.

41. Parcella E, et al. Preliminary results of an intravitreal dexamethasone implant (Ozurdex®) in patients with persistent diabetic macular edema. Clinical Ophthalmology. 2013; 7:1423–1428.


Review

For citations:


Kolbin A.S., Galankin T.L., Kaleev A.I. Pharmacoeconomic analysis of dexamethasone intravitreal implant for the treatment of diabetic macular edema in Russia. Kachestvennaya Klinicheskaya Praktika = Good Clinical Practice. 2018;(1):41-52. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24411/2588-0519-2018-10037

Views: 956


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2588-0519 (Print)
ISSN 2618-8473 (Online)

  

OSZAR »